Pro-Crypto Legislation in Washington: A Double-Edged Sword for Cryptocurrency’s Future

As the power in Washington, D.C. shifts with the incoming Trump administration, the cryptocurrency industry is poised for significant regulatory changes. Pro-crypto legislation, including the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), is expected to move forward, promising a regulatory framework that aims to support the growth of the sector. However, cybersecurity concerns could pose a serious challenge to the broader adoption of digital assets, especially as skepticism around their safety persists among the American public.

Crypto’s Growing Popularity vs. Public Skepticism

Cryptocurrency, which includes popular assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, has a devoted following in the U.S. According to the Pew Research Center, 17% of American adults have traded in crypto, but this market share has remained stagnant since 2021. On the flip side, a Pew poll conducted just before the 2024 election revealed that 63% of adults have little to no confidence in crypto investing, citing concerns over the reliability and safety of digital assets.

The Trump Administration’s Crypto Agenda

Despite these concerns, the incoming Trump administration has emphasized its commitment to the cryptocurrency industry. Republican lawmakers like Dusty Johnson (R-South Dakota), co-author of FIT21, have voiced strong support for creating a clear regulatory framework to enable businesses to operate in the digital asset space. Johnson, in a recent statement, stressed the need for regulations that facilitate crypto’s role in traditional finance.

FIT21, which passed in the House with bipartisan support, includes provisions aimed at addressing the treatment of digital assets under U.S. law. Importantly, the bill also incorporates cybersecurity measures, mandating that financial intermediaries engaging with digital assets take steps to protect both their services and the assets they manage. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pennsylvania), Chairman of the House Committee on Agriculture, highlighted these cybersecurity safeguards as essential for ensuring the stability and security of digital asset markets.

The Question of Cybersecurity in a Pro-Crypto Environment

Despite these optimistic plans, some experts remain skeptical about the effectiveness of the Trump administration’s approach to cybersecurity in the crypto space. Jeff Le, vice president of global government affairs and public policy at Security Scorecard, noted that key economic figures in the incoming administration have been strong crypto advocates, which may result in less focus on robust cybersecurity measures. Le highlighted that cryptocurrency’s decentralized and anonymous nature often makes regulation difficult and that advocates for crypto are typically reluctant to push for stricter rules.

Jason Baker, senior threat intelligence consultant at GuidePoint Security, expressed concerns that a pro-crypto agenda might inadvertently heighten risks in the cybersecurity realm. Cybercrime, such as ransomware attacks, often utilizes cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin for ransom payments. As cryptocurrency values rise, so too does the potential for financial gain for cybercriminals, making cybersecurity a pressing issue.

Crypto’s Political Influence and Legislative Outlook

The cryptocurrency industry has been a significant political player, contributing heavily to the 2024 election cycle. While these donations have not been limited to any one political party, the industry’s influence is especially strong within the GOP. Super PACs like Fairshake, backed by major players like Coinbase and Andreessen Horowitz, have already raised over $100 million for the 2026 midterm elections, further solidifying the crypto sector’s political clout.

Despite the push for a more favorable regulatory environment, experts like Baker believe that significant regulation on cryptocurrency is unlikely in the near future. With the Trump administration focused more on facilitating crypto industry growth than on imposing stringent regulations, Baker suggests that cybersecurity concerns will continue to be a secondary issue in policy discussions.

Related Articles